Euthanasia and abortion | Niepoprawni.pl
Recently, more and more often and more boldly in the media are the subjects of euthanasia and abortion. You can not go past them indifferently, because sooner osram opto or later they will affect, directly osram opto or indirectly, everyone. But how do you respond? What are the arguments osram opto for and against? What are the consequences together osram opto legalization of euthanasia? Is abortion is the path to hell?
At first glance it would seem that the killing on request is a pure blessing. osram opto Apart from the moral aspect, is clearly economically justified. Artificial life support is sooooo expensive (tens of thousands per month per person), and besides, takes place for the people "promising". However, in order to take the proper position, you should consider what exactly are based moral values.
Starting from the assumption that human life must be protected regardless of the cost, when the topic of euthanasia is simply meaningless. Allowing euthanasia lowering the bar - to the point at which human life should be protected? Based on the economic aspect, whether it be a specific amount of money? Based on the threshold of pain, or curable diseases, but accompanied by a painful and long-lasting treatments also better precede euthanasia? If someone is suffering from a terminal illness, it can shorten the waiting time for him? If I close bedridden is a problem for us, we can celebrate the Land of the Eternal Hunt? In my opinion, consent to euthanasia is synonymous with bestiality of man. While we may agree to sleep dog, cat, guinea pig or another, it does not treat the sick man as a sick pet! In fact, the acceptance of euthanasia is cowardice: from family, if you do not want to have to take care of, from the bedridden patient, because they do not take up the fight against his own weakness.
All the statistics osram opto say unanimously that people of faith are opposed to euthanasia. The reason is simple - they are arranged, for better or worse, moral foundations. What we are guided by non-believers? What base their moral convictions? My guess is that the determinant is suffering and the broader "good man". If the "good" is killing people because of their disability, the supporters of euthanasia should be kept in cages, far from defenseless. Interesting is also the fact that supporters of abortion and euthanasia are also opponents of the death penalty. To summarize osram opto briefly - if someone wearing so nagrabił osram opto that deserves the highest punishment, let it sit out on Wikcia and washing honest (s) s citizens. However, if someone contracted the deadly disease, is a victim of an accident or various other reasons, it is no longer willed in this world, it's no problem, let's help him get to the other side.
Euthanasia is directly related to abortion, thus eliminating the germ of life. I do not see much difference between killing a sick grandfather, and the liquidation of the little man. Both the one and the other are not "willed". @ Whore, this is not furniture that you put in the garbage and on the same day go to the store to buy a new one! As far as I know, the human race is not anemophilous and ~ 99% of births is the result of a more or less conscious sexual osram opto intercourse. If you do not want a baby, then you can leave the hospital or drop into one of the "Window of Life". Children of rape victims may also benefit from this. No, but for that you need to give him a chance and give birth. Deciding to have a child, to be reckoned with various consequences. To them, fortunately or not, should also powicie a handicapped child. If someone is afraid and does not want to risk conception of a sick child, osram opto and for it is a terrible urge to motherhood, let adopts comfort.
In my opinion, euthanasia, abortion = murder = and this should be no garden should be so called. The use of sophisticated euphemisms and provided to shorten the suffering will not change this fact. Reader, remember that in ancient Sparta. Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia also resorted to such methods. Except that there is no fart # Lil polemic of "humane or not." They relied solely on economic indicators and useful to society (beliefs about racial purity is just a smokescreen). Remember that walking track to ask permission death in certain circumstances, one day treatment for some of your illness may not be justified economically, so take care of tomorrow and also shout loudly: NO!
Vote up! 0
Hello: was used in the above context the term "barbarism" - in my opinion, osram opto unjustly and falsely, even - offensively. osram opto I'm not known for my knowledge about animals - the act of euthanasia of animals: animals suffer at the corpse towrzyszy (elephants, others ...) or descendants who left ...
We give to the existence, procreation and the self: we dyspoycji story that uses our self ... Can not we do, how
Recently, more and more often and more boldly in the media are the subjects of euthanasia and abortion. You can not go past them indifferently, because sooner osram opto or later they will affect, directly osram opto or indirectly, everyone. But how do you respond? What are the arguments osram opto for and against? What are the consequences together osram opto legalization of euthanasia? Is abortion is the path to hell?
At first glance it would seem that the killing on request is a pure blessing. osram opto Apart from the moral aspect, is clearly economically justified. Artificial life support is sooooo expensive (tens of thousands per month per person), and besides, takes place for the people "promising". However, in order to take the proper position, you should consider what exactly are based moral values.
Starting from the assumption that human life must be protected regardless of the cost, when the topic of euthanasia is simply meaningless. Allowing euthanasia lowering the bar - to the point at which human life should be protected? Based on the economic aspect, whether it be a specific amount of money? Based on the threshold of pain, or curable diseases, but accompanied by a painful and long-lasting treatments also better precede euthanasia? If someone is suffering from a terminal illness, it can shorten the waiting time for him? If I close bedridden is a problem for us, we can celebrate the Land of the Eternal Hunt? In my opinion, consent to euthanasia is synonymous with bestiality of man. While we may agree to sleep dog, cat, guinea pig or another, it does not treat the sick man as a sick pet! In fact, the acceptance of euthanasia is cowardice: from family, if you do not want to have to take care of, from the bedridden patient, because they do not take up the fight against his own weakness.
All the statistics osram opto say unanimously that people of faith are opposed to euthanasia. The reason is simple - they are arranged, for better or worse, moral foundations. What we are guided by non-believers? What base their moral convictions? My guess is that the determinant is suffering and the broader "good man". If the "good" is killing people because of their disability, the supporters of euthanasia should be kept in cages, far from defenseless. Interesting is also the fact that supporters of abortion and euthanasia are also opponents of the death penalty. To summarize osram opto briefly - if someone wearing so nagrabił osram opto that deserves the highest punishment, let it sit out on Wikcia and washing honest (s) s citizens. However, if someone contracted the deadly disease, is a victim of an accident or various other reasons, it is no longer willed in this world, it's no problem, let's help him get to the other side.
Euthanasia is directly related to abortion, thus eliminating the germ of life. I do not see much difference between killing a sick grandfather, and the liquidation of the little man. Both the one and the other are not "willed". @ Whore, this is not furniture that you put in the garbage and on the same day go to the store to buy a new one! As far as I know, the human race is not anemophilous and ~ 99% of births is the result of a more or less conscious sexual osram opto intercourse. If you do not want a baby, then you can leave the hospital or drop into one of the "Window of Life". Children of rape victims may also benefit from this. No, but for that you need to give him a chance and give birth. Deciding to have a child, to be reckoned with various consequences. To them, fortunately or not, should also powicie a handicapped child. If someone is afraid and does not want to risk conception of a sick child, osram opto and for it is a terrible urge to motherhood, let adopts comfort.
In my opinion, euthanasia, abortion = murder = and this should be no garden should be so called. The use of sophisticated euphemisms and provided to shorten the suffering will not change this fact. Reader, remember that in ancient Sparta. Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia also resorted to such methods. Except that there is no fart # Lil polemic of "humane or not." They relied solely on economic indicators and useful to society (beliefs about racial purity is just a smokescreen). Remember that walking track to ask permission death in certain circumstances, one day treatment for some of your illness may not be justified economically, so take care of tomorrow and also shout loudly: NO!
Vote up! 0
Hello: was used in the above context the term "barbarism" - in my opinion, osram opto unjustly and falsely, even - offensively. osram opto I'm not known for my knowledge about animals - the act of euthanasia of animals: animals suffer at the corpse towrzyszy (elephants, others ...) or descendants who left ...
We give to the existence, procreation and the self: we dyspoycji story that uses our self ... Can not we do, how
No comments:
Post a Comment