After the expert pier 2 Sehn Institute: we do not know the causes of the disaster | Niepoprawni.pl
What is the main message of the media in support of the government after the conference, the prosecutor pier 2 and the disclosure of expert phonographic Sehn Institute? 1 Voice of General Błasik not been identified, it is not known whether he was in the cockpit of 2 There is no reason to cast doubt on the findings of the Miller on the main causes of the disaster. Note that this thesis are consistent with the government's position delivered by the minute. Kwiatkowski in television programs. Kwiatkowski claimed that none of the three main causes of the crash has not been challenged. These causes include bad weather, bad work air traffic controllers and pilots error. Meanwhile portal wpolityce cites evidence of the fact that it is different: In the attached picture we present this page transcript prepared by the experts of Krakow, which clearly shows that: - the words "One hundred meters" (the chair. 8:40:44,5) assigned Gen. Błasikowi today said the second pilot Robert Fine - at a height of 100 meters crew - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS - was a long - by seven seconds, then - probably not seeing the ground, she decided to go to the second circle. More precisely explains the Macierewicz: This expertise means that there are two basic false theses of reports MAK and committees Minister Jerzy Miller: about the pressure exerted by Gen. Andrew Błasik pier 2 pilots of the Tu-154M, second pilot error. As for the alleged reading from a radio altimeter, which directly led to the disaster. Meanwhile - as determined by experts of the institute Sehn - key words, pier 2 after which issued the command "retire", were read from the barometric altimeter that precisely defines the distance from the airport runway, and not from the actual terrain. This means that the maneuver leave was taken at the right time, and not - as we read in the report, the committee Miller - much too late. What is the most important conclusion here? As the crew flew barometric altimeter according to the indications, pier 2 if acted according to the procedures without pier 2 committing an error, why the plane crashed? http://wpolityce.pl/wydarzenia/21569-oto-dowod-manipulacji-i-oszczerstw-pod-adresem-gen-blasika-kluczowa-strona-stenogramu http://niezalezna.pl/21860-% E2% 80% 9Ecodzienna% E2% 80% 9D-reveals-recent-examination
Alexola
Steel "experts" tvn24 even before the conference, prosecutors had the following explanation for the absence of Gen. Błasik in the cockpit: pier 2 it is not identified his voice, it may be that silent (ominously silent). A similar logic translation prosecutor made a Szeląg, so discussing the results of experiments with TU154M No. 102 said that in an experiment comparing the recorded sounds from opening pier 2 the door to the cockpit, with sounds recorded on tape, is proof that the door was open (not registered sound characteristic of the opening operation drzwi.Pytanie: maybe the door was locked and therefore not recorded sounds characteristic ').
I do not believe IES!
Unfortunately, I am not convinced this record. There are moments incomprehensible - where "crosstalk read backwards", from info that the final record "at the very beginning of the tape side B" as there is no previous info that "break pier 2 due to changes in the direction of the transport pier 2 belt" in return "4s pier 2 unreadable due to media failure ie . the wrinkles "or something like that - linden have done with giwerami at potylicach?
Polish TV Newspaper independent television material posted filmowy.Niestety probably was not the footage from the whole, that is my guess. There is no material issue at the portal pier 2 Newspaper Polish TV journalist fragment of asking for the name of the person giving the information about the state / height pier 2 was about copilot. The prosecutor did not want to give names. This piece of film I'd seen before on the internet or TV. This passage is not in the material from the independent television portal Newspapers Polish TV. I have a question whether the material placed on the Internet by independent television is broadcast in its entirety, or was cut with passages like so, why? Do not have time to save the whole it works censorship.? Who has access to all the material?
Today instance of prosecutors says it all. They do not have to admit anything, admitted his behavior. Which are showing the side and on which a halter. pier 2 It's a disgrace, dishonor and slander for true patriots. If such we have representatives in the highest offices is a sign that it is time for the final solution. However, if the Polish Gazeta TV has all the material and on the website is what it is something I do not fit here.
What is the main message of the media in support of the government after the conference, the prosecutor pier 2 and the disclosure of expert phonographic Sehn Institute? 1 Voice of General Błasik not been identified, it is not known whether he was in the cockpit of 2 There is no reason to cast doubt on the findings of the Miller on the main causes of the disaster. Note that this thesis are consistent with the government's position delivered by the minute. Kwiatkowski in television programs. Kwiatkowski claimed that none of the three main causes of the crash has not been challenged. These causes include bad weather, bad work air traffic controllers and pilots error. Meanwhile portal wpolityce cites evidence of the fact that it is different: In the attached picture we present this page transcript prepared by the experts of Krakow, which clearly shows that: - the words "One hundred meters" (the chair. 8:40:44,5) assigned Gen. Błasikowi today said the second pilot Robert Fine - at a height of 100 meters crew - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS - was a long - by seven seconds, then - probably not seeing the ground, she decided to go to the second circle. More precisely explains the Macierewicz: This expertise means that there are two basic false theses of reports MAK and committees Minister Jerzy Miller: about the pressure exerted by Gen. Andrew Błasik pier 2 pilots of the Tu-154M, second pilot error. As for the alleged reading from a radio altimeter, which directly led to the disaster. Meanwhile - as determined by experts of the institute Sehn - key words, pier 2 after which issued the command "retire", were read from the barometric altimeter that precisely defines the distance from the airport runway, and not from the actual terrain. This means that the maneuver leave was taken at the right time, and not - as we read in the report, the committee Miller - much too late. What is the most important conclusion here? As the crew flew barometric altimeter according to the indications, pier 2 if acted according to the procedures without pier 2 committing an error, why the plane crashed? http://wpolityce.pl/wydarzenia/21569-oto-dowod-manipulacji-i-oszczerstw-pod-adresem-gen-blasika-kluczowa-strona-stenogramu http://niezalezna.pl/21860-% E2% 80% 9Ecodzienna% E2% 80% 9D-reveals-recent-examination
Alexola
Steel "experts" tvn24 even before the conference, prosecutors had the following explanation for the absence of Gen. Błasik in the cockpit: pier 2 it is not identified his voice, it may be that silent (ominously silent). A similar logic translation prosecutor made a Szeląg, so discussing the results of experiments with TU154M No. 102 said that in an experiment comparing the recorded sounds from opening pier 2 the door to the cockpit, with sounds recorded on tape, is proof that the door was open (not registered sound characteristic of the opening operation drzwi.Pytanie: maybe the door was locked and therefore not recorded sounds characteristic ').
I do not believe IES!
Unfortunately, I am not convinced this record. There are moments incomprehensible - where "crosstalk read backwards", from info that the final record "at the very beginning of the tape side B" as there is no previous info that "break pier 2 due to changes in the direction of the transport pier 2 belt" in return "4s pier 2 unreadable due to media failure ie . the wrinkles "or something like that - linden have done with giwerami at potylicach?
Polish TV Newspaper independent television material posted filmowy.Niestety probably was not the footage from the whole, that is my guess. There is no material issue at the portal pier 2 Newspaper Polish TV journalist fragment of asking for the name of the person giving the information about the state / height pier 2 was about copilot. The prosecutor did not want to give names. This piece of film I'd seen before on the internet or TV. This passage is not in the material from the independent television portal Newspapers Polish TV. I have a question whether the material placed on the Internet by independent television is broadcast in its entirety, or was cut with passages like so, why? Do not have time to save the whole it works censorship.? Who has access to all the material?
Today instance of prosecutors says it all. They do not have to admit anything, admitted his behavior. Which are showing the side and on which a halter. pier 2 It's a disgrace, dishonor and slander for true patriots. If such we have representatives in the highest offices is a sign that it is time for the final solution. However, if the Polish Gazeta TV has all the material and on the website is what it is something I do not fit here.
No comments:
Post a Comment